| Statewide
Fair Funding Principles
DRAFT
These
principles are the result of two years of extensive public meetings and
community forums held in New York City and across New York State. They
were developed from the common themes on fiscal equity reform contained
in position papers issued by the Campaign for Fiscal Equity, the League
of Women Voters of New York State, the New York State PTAs, the New York
State School Boards Association, and the New York State United Teachers.
These common themes were discussed and refined through
intensive discussions at statewide forums co-sponsored by most of these
organizations, as well as the Educational Priorities Panel, the New York
Urban League, the State Communities Aid Association, the American Jewish
Committee of Western New York, the Buffalo Teachers Federation, the
Conference of Big Five School Districts, the New York Civil Liberties
Union, and Reform Educational Financing Inequities Today (R.E.F.I.T.).
The result was a revised version of the Fair Funding Principles, which
we then presented to participants in two culminating conferences, one in
Albany and one in New York City. The two groups represented a diverse
range of stakeholders and expressed their strong support for the ideas
contained in these principles.
All New Yorkers have a stake in
education reform and securing the opportunity for a sound basic
education for every child in the state. We believe that parents,
teachers, administrators, school boards, business leaders, community
organizations, and other individuals and groups can support these five
principles while continuing to adhere to their own specific positions on
how they should be applied.
Statewide
Fair Funding Principles For a Sound Basic Education
| I. |
The state should guarantee that
every school district has sufficient funds to provide all students
the opportunity for a sound basic education.
The New York State Constitution guarantees all students the
opportunity for a sound basic education. Therefore, it is the
state's responsibility to make sure that sufficient funds are
available to give all students this opportunity. The State Board
of Regents has issued a new set of Learning Standards and
requirements for receiving a high school diploma. The state must
make sure that all students have the resources they need to meet
these standards. |
| II. |
The state should determine the
actual cost of providing all students the opportunity for a sound
basic education.
Historically, school funding in New York State has been based
more on differences in local tax bases and politically-determined
state aid "formulas" than on the actual costs of
providing a sound basic education. New York State's current
foundation funding level of $3,900 per pupil is arbitrary and
insufficient, and the state's current formulas do not do enough to
compensate for disparities between property-poor and property-rich
districts.
Across the country, a growing number of states are setting
foundation levels based on the actual costs of providing an
adequate education. A cost-based system for New York State should
ensure that the basic funding level is sufficient to provide the
opportunity for a sound basic education (the "SBE amount").
To make this process as fair and objective as possible, an
independent commission should establish the "costing-out"
methodology and determine the initial SBE amount. To promote
stability, the SBE amount should be established for a five-year
period, subject to annual inflationary adjustments. |
| III. |
The state should provide at least
50% of total statewide educational expenditures while requiring
maintenance of a fair level of local funding efforts.
New York State currently provides approximately 40% of all
funds for public education, while local school districts provide
nearly 56%. An increase in the state share will promote fiscal
equity in two ways:
The state can raise revenues from a wider range of
sources than local school districts.
The state can compensate for low property wealth in
certain districts by equalizing its formulas.
For these reasons, New York State should provide at least half
of the total funds for public education in the state. (Of course,
not every district would receive 50% of its funds from the state.
Districts with low property wealth and low income levels would
receive substantially more state aid than wealthy districts.)
Increasing the state's share of school funding may permit
reductions in local property taxes and other local taxes. |
| IV. |
The state should ensure greater
fiscal equity among school districts. |
| |
|
The state should increase aid to poor districts
but should not impose ceilings on expenditures of any other
districts. |
| |
|
Increased aid should be provided for students
who are at risk due to concentrated poverty, disability or limited
English language skills, and for population sparsity. |
| |
|
Variations in local costs should be taken into
account. |
| |
|
The current property assessment system should
be reformed to ensure uniform standards and regular reassessments.
The State's primary educational responsibility should be to
ensure that all students have the opportunity for a sound basic
education and the resources they need to meet the new Regents'
learning standards. If additional state aid is distributed with
these goals in mind, the spending gap between wealthy and poor
districts will be narrowed.
Increased aid should especially be focused on providing
additional programs and instructional time for students with
special needs so that they are prepared to meet the new standards.
These reforms, however, should be implemented in a way that:
does not lower the quality of education in those schools
that are currently meeting high standards, and
accounts for cost differences that exist in various
parts of the state.
Fiscal equity reform will also require major changes in New York
State's archaic and unfair property tax assessment system. |
|